The NLRB has invited parties and interested amici to comment on several issues arising from the controversial finding by a Regional Director that Northwestern University grant-in-aid scholarship football players can unionize (Case 13-RC-121359).
On April 24, 2014, the Board granted Northwestern University’s request to review the decision. The request for review and decision and direction of election raised substantial issues warranting review, the Board said in a statement.
1. What test should the Board apply to determine whether grant-in-aid scholarship football players are “employees” within the meaning of Section 2(3) of the Act, and what is the proper result here, applying the appropriate test?
2. Insofar as the Board’s decision in Brown University, 342 NLRB 483 (2004), may be applicable to this case, should the Board adhere to, modify, or overrule the test of employee status applied in that case, and if so, on what basis?
3. What policy considerations are relevant to the Board’s determination of whether grant-in-aid scholarship football players are “employees” within the meaning of Section 2(3) of the Act and what result do they suggest here?
4. To what extent, if any, is the existence or absence of determinations regarding employee status of grant-in-aid scholarship football players under other federal or state statutes or regulations relevant to whether such players are “employees” under the Act?
5. To what extent are the employment discrimination provisions of Title VII, in comparison to the antidiscrimination provisions of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972, relevant to whether grant-in-aid scholarship football players are “employees” under the Act?
6. If grant-in-aid scholarship football players are “employees” under the Act, to what extent, if any, should the Board consider, in determining the parties’ collective bargaining obligations, the existence of outside constraints that may alter the ability of the parties to engage in collective bargaining as to certain terms and conditions of employment? What, if any, should be the impact of such constraints on the parties’ bargaining obligations? In the alternative, should the Board recognize grant-in-aid scholarship football players as “employees” under the Act, but preclude them from being represented in any bargaining unit or engaging in any collective bargaining, as is the case with confidential employees under Board law?
Briefs must be filed electronically by going to www.nlrb.gov and clicking on “E-File Documents.” Parties and amici must serve all case participants on the case participants list under the heading “Service Documents.” If assistance is needed in E-Filing, please contact the Office of Executive Secretary at 202-273-1940 or Executive Secretary Gary Shinners at 202-273-3737. (WKL&B Editorial Staff.)
For more information on this and other topics, consult the Visit our News Library.